◧ pickaside.
All comparisons
Board games

Codenames vs Wavelength

Both reward a group that already talks in references. They fail in different ways.

Codenames is a 2015 team clue game, about 15 minutes, built around a grid. Wavelength, designed by Alex Hague, Justin Vickers, and Wolfgang Warsch and published in 2019, plays 2–12 and often 30–45 minutes. One player gives a clue on a spectrum, and the team tries to place a dial where a hidden target sits.

Codenames can freeze if the clue-giver cannot find a word. Wavelength can freeze if the group does not share a culture: a spectrum like hot to cold is easy, and a spectrum that assumes the same films is not. Look at who is in the room, not at which box is newer.

Codenames

Choose Codenames when you want a clear score and a short round you can repeat. It needs two people willing to give clues.

Wavelength

Choose Wavelength when the group is big and you want the argument to be the game. It is worse if half the room will not know the reference on the card. Skip a card rather than explain the joke for five minutes.

What actually differs

Codenames and Wavelength, side by side
DifferenceCodenamesWavelength
PlayersTeams2–12
LengthAbout 15 minutesOften 30–45 minutes
Year20152019
EquipmentWord gridA dial and spectrum cards
Failure modeA bad clueA spectrum nobody shares

Questions about this choice

Is Wavelength a drinking game?

It is a party game. Alcohol is not a rule. A loud room can play it. A room that needs the designer’s sense of humour on every card will stall.

Which travels better?

Codenames has a compact edition and an app. Wavelength’s dial is the game. If you are carrying one box on a train, look at the actual size of the copy you own.

Related comparisons